This graph really, really annoyed me:
I’ve seen this graph a dozen times; this one is from politico magazine, but that doesn’t matter: It’s horribly misleading.
It is about the most dishonest graph I’ve ever seen – and I’ve seen plenty.
Well – do you notice that arbitrary line at “2/3 vote” drawn into the graph? Makes the “yes” vote look really wanting to extend to that line, doesn’t it?
Sure, the 2/3rds majority is necessary, but that’s a democratic vote result – usually shown in block graphs:
Oh, look; I’ve managed to draw exactly the same graph with exactly the same arbitrary line at 2/3rds, but now the prospector might actually get the really important information? Hint: Guess which vote got the majority?
Which, ignoring the arbitrary line, should be – well, you can see that in my graph. Just like if the function of media were to report truth.
See- I can skew that close a result without being that dishonest….
Still the same graph, you see? No? Learn fucking statistics or at least:
Please pay attention to the numbers before looking at a graph. You can make any graph quite arbitrarily “say” anything you want – e.g., by inserting random lines, even if you are stupid. True does not exclude misleading.
Oh, btw, that makes you a demagogue.